DALL-E AI Art Generator Finally Opens The Doors To A Wider Internet

Artwork created with artificial intelligence showing a man holding his chest while typing on a computer

I asked DALL-E to create an image of a reporter struggling to set a deadline, Caravaggio style. I wouldn’t say that he really captured the old master’s taste,”Lots of impressionism. However, I feel the pain of the topic.
picture: DALL-E

Online photo and art archives have already been flooded with images developed with artificial intelligence. Expect more images of high fantasy or images of questionable origin now that the arguably started artificial intelligence image generator that started the current synthetic image craze, DALL-E, is open and available to everyone.

on wednesday Blog postDALL-E OpenAI developer said it has it before 1.5 million users create more than 2 million AI-generated photos every day. Using the data and feedback, the company said it has made its filters stronger in rejecting any images made to simulate sexual, violent or peeHe. Sheical . content. There is no current API available for DALL-E, but it appears to be in development.

The DALL-E section of OpenAI website Users are still required to sign up for a waiting list, as of the time Reports, although there is a file Signal top of page. In an email statement, OpenAI said that from the start it has taken an “iterative deployment approach to responsibly scaling DALL-E, which has helped us discover ways it can be used as a powerful creative tool.”

Users who sign up get 50 free credits for creating images during the first month, and then 15 free credits each month after that.

OpenAI’s image generator was first revealed in April, and people quickly put themselves on hold, some fiddling with their thumbs for months before getting their turn. Although DALL-E is named after the famous artist Salvador Dali and written in the style of Disney-Pixar Wall-EIt was the first system to make a real leap in the capabilities of AI image technology and other systems have absorbed, at least in terms of popularity. Medjourney hosts hundreds of thousands of users on its Discord-based platform, and StabilityAI, makers of the AI ​​art generator Stable Diffusion, are in talks about collect millions Against the background of its most flexible and most controversial system.

The OpenAI advertisement puts itself in a very strange place due to the growing popularity of AI arts and also due to public pressure against them. Washington Post I spoke with several OpenAI product chiefs while demonstrating how the software can be used to create images of fake protests, which would be against the company’s restrictions on creating political images. The system limits user claims by triggering content warnings on words such as “teenager” and “teenager”. At the same time, although the system should restrict claims based on public figures, the newspaper noted that it still allows users to create images based on people like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk.

There is still a major question of ownership. A tech CEO has become a concern for entering an AI-generated piece of art in a local art competition and Winning the first prize. Last week, artist claimed I first copyrighted work created with artificial intelligence art, but the US Copyright Office has stated that it does not accept any work that was not created by human hands, which means the question is still in limbo.

Of course, none of the most famous picture producers have avoided controversy. The stable prevalence of its use has been cited Generating child pornographyBut StabilityAI founder Imad Mostaqi said they are working on systems to block such content. The heads of StabilityAI and OpenAI companies have gone back and forth about which of their systems are least controversial.

Last week, OpenAI announced that it was Lifting restrictions Which prevented users from uploading real human faces to the AI ​​model until they cracked for editing. The company promised that it had invented detection technology to prevent users from doing so Abuse of the system to create pornographic or violent content. It is assumed that users have been prevented from uploading pictures of people’s faces without the consent of the person concerned. The company had already opened their systems For researchers looking to create artificial human faces.

Leave a Comment